9/11 puzzle was completed worldwide first by Matt Marriott

9/11 for dummies - The Five Basic Facts, by Matt Marriott

1. There was no plane debris at the Pentagon.
Cover-up: none. "Witnesses" and an old piece of metal was the package used to make sure that people get the message "It was an inside job", as part of the truth planted to terrorize you.
Web of disinformation: some (rense, whatreallyhappened.com, etc) go as far as to try to cover-up what was meant to be obvious, since that helps people to swallow the core lie.

2. There was no plane debris at Shanksville.
Cover up: live videos of first images on the scene never shown again; packaging it to let the web of disinformation continue the job.
Web of disinformation: suggesting the plane was shot down.
First Video footage at the scene and first aerial view (joke: sepia filter, in allusion to the moon landing hoax) show no debris whatsoever
youtube.com/watch?v=JZekosYOmXc -- https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HpBeF5scrtA

3. The WTC towers were pulled.
Cover up: live footage only from close-up scenes (smoke, people running away); no live videos with global view on 9/11 or ever after. Unprecedented demolition technique.
Hoax: faked photos released short after, with WTC tower above "impact" tilting.
Web of disinformation: will not deny it, since is not important to make people swallow the core lie. Used to cover-up which was the unprecedented demolition technique.
BTW, here is finally video of the first tower as it was demolished:
youtube.com/watch?v=ExrVgioIXvk

4. No planes ever hit the WTC towers. The simple truth, the other side of the coin being the core lie: we saw the second "impact" live. As long as people believe it, the BIG LIE technique will work.
Hoax: CNN inserts the second "plane" with real time software, disappearing behind the burning tower, one second before the "impact", i.e. the bombs are detonated. Faked photos and videos, most released short after, with frontal "plane" crashes.
Cover-up: WTC prepared with explosives to simulate the wings and bombs to simulate the jet fuel explosion; no live videos (frontal view) on 9/11, no videos ever after, exposing the core lie.
Web of disinformation: all sorts of false tracks, from remote controlled planes to holograms. Anything as long as people believe that CNN had nothing to do with it.
BTW, the previous video also exposes the core lie, showing why the second tower to be "hit" had to be pulled first.

5. Some people were previously murdered to account for the "passengers".
Hoax: "passengers" were faked, previously murdered (Barbara Olson) or given new identities; family members reporting cell phone calls to these "passengers". In the case of real people, two cases, depending if they were offered an opportunity to get rid of someone (Ted Olson) or not.
Cover-up: family members evaporate, other than those part of the conspiracy.

Again: understanding the core lie was not required to see that "Reichstag Fire = 9/11". Any of the first three facts were enough for that. The first ever since day one.

Note
Perps forced YouTube to remove videos without link, invoking copyright by illuminati media.

Original article in forums 1 - 2

---

The core cover-up of the 9/11 WTC bombs operation - Theory with probability close to 100 pct - mini H-bomb used - added 17 September 2006

Conventional bombs plus ...

As explained in "The five basic facts", the three basic types of non-nuclear bombs used in the 9/11 WTC operation, depending on the goal:
- to simulate the impacts of the "planes" against the structure, by leaving the imprints of the "wings";
- to simulate the explosion of the "kerosine" of the "airplanes" immediately after;
- to be used at the moment where the towers would be pulled.

... Unprecedented Demolition Technique: Mini H-bomb in basement upwards directed: Finnish Military Expert solves last unclear issue about how 9/11 was executed

The core lie is "there were planes". The core cover-up is what exactly was the unprecedented demolition technique used.
First of all, watch this VIDEO - MIT Engineer Jeff King breaks up the demolition

Now it's just connecting the dots, here: Mini Hydrogen-bomb in basement. upwards directed: Finnish Military Expert solves last unclear issue about how 9/11 was executed.

Although this is not a fact, this theory has a degree pf probability close to 100 pct, since it's the only one that can explain:
- the facts observed on 9/11;
- what happened to the survivors that were at the scene as the cores of the towers were turned into dust. They are either dead or terminally ill, the symptoms being again what you would expect from this theory.

Three facts that you would expect from End Times Reductionism

1. The fact that despite thousands of individuals with the know-how to denounce this, it took almost five years for that to happen.
2. Two premieres go unnoticed: unprecedented demolition technique but above all the first time that a government uses nuclear bombs against its own citizens.
3. I do remember this Finnish Military Expert from the CNN Kosovo Board, as the Third World War officially began, 24 March 1999... he was one of the few to stand for the truth then.
Eight years later, there are even less people that will do it.
Once again as you would expect, according to the Laws of End Times Reductionism.
Original article in forums: 1 - 2

---

9/11 - Illuminati plan TOTALLY revealed - what was genius - explained worldwide first by Matt Marriott

September 18, 2006 - This very page becomes the first page worldwide to TOTALLY expose 9/11 - Illuminati stage Mass slaughter in Lower Manhattan.
http://911-for-dummies.blogspot.com/
So why was the complete puzzle so difficult to solve?
Basically the plan worked due to three reasons that reflect the features of End Times Reductionism, the OPPOSITE of genius:
- total illuminati control of mass media;
- totally terrorized sheep (see staging the "Pentagon crash");
- totally brainwashed sheep (which includes not being willing to admit total illuminati control of mass media).

You need to review the basic pieces of that plan, that five years later only one page managed to put together, to finally see what was genius:

- the basic idea to implement the plan of hijacked planes, the core lie: no planes, second "jet" inserted by mass media;
- the only technical detail revealing genius, was (literally) the core cover-up: demolition of the WTC cores, using a mini Hydrogen-bomb in basement, upwards directed;
- the choice of the combination of personalities used to convince people, in the first days and in the first year, about the "passengers". Ted Olson was just a conspirator celebrating the murder of his wife; for the sheep Barbara Olson was one of the last personalities that they would imagine that the "conservatives" would murder, but that was not the case for anyone aware of how the illuminati had closed all controversies about Clinton immediately after his "acquittal". That proved that Barbara Olson was not playing an illuminati role.
Genius was the choice of the other one, Lisa Beamer, the one that really mattered all along the first year, the period of time that really mattered in the illuminati planning, who was truly grieving the death of her husband. And as planned, she didn't get it, until that was irrelevant for the illuminati.

At that time, they were already rolling.
Original article in forums 1 - 2

---

Compilation of related articles, with links to original article in forums:

Media Hoax

2004-2006
- WTC: No Planes - the Core Lie (1)
- Mini Hydrogen-bombs - The core cover-up of the 9/11 WTC bombs demolition
- WTC 7, 9/11 first terror message, explained last (1)
- Eyewitnesses and TV audience vs. core lie and core cover-up (1)
- Shanksville, Pentagon and the 9/11 "passengers" (1)
- 9/11 Web of Disinformation managed by the CIA (1)

(1) part of the script I was worldwide the first to completely explain, as far as I know.

---

2007 - the end of the story
9/11 TRUTH FLASHBACK - from the day Matt Marriot revealed it first time to the day it is no more questioned - videos completely exposing the TV fakery by CNN and Fox News and the "eyewitnesses" presented by the media immediately after the hoax was staged

911 Truth - No Planes - Media Hoax - The Core Lie- Don't blame Google...

Don't blame Google...

The most important trick that lead people to believe the most devastating hoax ever - evolution theory - was a black and white cartoon with a four drawings sequence from ape to human.
One century later, the most important trick used to let people believe the first "live" hoax broadcasted worldwide was a fuzzy black and white TV footage shot in a low budget studio.
32 years later, the most important trick used to let people believe that planes were the weapon used in the first mass slaughter broadcasted live worldwide was ... cheap software, inserted by the first global TV channel, CNN.
The key trick used to stage 9/11 exposed, CNN using computers to insert the second plane disappearing behind the tower before the explosion. with real time software ... Google returns it today as result #1: http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=9%2F11+%22computers+were+used%22
 Posted first March 2005, thread deleted - first result shoud be this thread, that was soon locked but is still available to read.

---

The core lie - The most important trick and CNN - 01/09/11- Five years ago, the shortest of all BIG LIES (3 seconds) took place

One of the frames from those three seconds:

Three seconds repeated relentlessly during the first hours of CNN "coverage" - as the news of the Pentagon broke it had been repeated already dozens of times. The camera is fixed, to let insert the "plane" with real time software. Those  three seconds were the only frames of a plane shown, while all the other video and photo material was being photoshopped or video edited at this point, in particular the piece requiring a real graphic software artist: the frontal crashes...the second crash ...
 
... and, as you would expect from the BIG LIE framework. even for the first crash.... 
Unfortunately for the conspirators, one of the consequences of using that framework, is: the bigger the lie, the easier it is to expose it.... it takes two minutes to get those three seconds... 9/11 for dummies - The Five Basic Facts - exposed in forums first time June 2004. As far as the "witnesses" and the praticability of not using any planes see also below.
2006, 11th September - 5 years ago -  the shortest of all BIG LIES (3 seconds)

---

WTC "planes" - a bigger lie than the Pentagon and Shanksville "planes"

The second impact "live", three seconds repeated dozens of times on 9/11 - that was the only video with a plane released on 9/11. A plane but no crash is visible in that video.
But the BIG LIE framework requires regular upscaling. So videos of the frontal "impact" and photos of tilting towers at the moment of the collapse were released the days after.
This leads to another consequence of the BIG LIE framework: the bigger the lie the easier it is to expose it.
In this case, that material can be immediately exposed as fake, by simply comparing them with footage of tests of real planes crashing or of the WTC towers being demolished. Those videos of the frontal "impacts"  expose the second impact "live" images released by the media on 9/11 as fakes.
Or in other words, it exposes the fact that the WTC "planes" is an even bigger lie than the Pentagon and Shanksville "planes"... because the starting point to search the h truth is no more the government that the sheep long accepted as corrupted, but ALL the mass media of "free" Amerika.

---

The core lie and the web of disinformation of CIA psy-ops

Holograms Hoax as example

The article exposes the core lie, which is "there were plane crashes on 9/11". The web of disinformation set up by the CIA: agents like Alex Jones, who is now even on CNN, dozens of sites like whatreallyhappened.com. They play the role of exposing 9/11, their main goal is that people swallow the core lie. In the process they plant all sort of false tracks, to divert truth seekers, while discrediting the simple truth.
The BIG LIE techniques go as far as, for special audiences, stating 99 pct of truth, as long as they swallow the rest, i.e. the core lie.
For those who finally start to question the core lie, the web of disinformation created the hoax that the trick used to suggest planes was holograms. This works the same way as the hoax they created immediately after 9/11, remote controlled planes: it discourages people from continuing to seek the truth, once they realise that would have been technically impossible.
Source: sciforums.com
SciForums.com moved it immediately from folder "computer science" to "pseudoscience". It was closed as soon as enough operatives "replied" claiming the opposite of the title of the thread.

9/11 TV and Eyewitnesses - Praticability

Five years after 9/11, the sheep didn't get the basic script for 9/11 - why

Five years after 9/11, the sheep didn't get the basic script for 9/11 because they they became blind. Black is the end times color.
Total brainwash includes not having the ability to recognise these two basic illuminati end times features:

1. ALL mass media is TOTALLY controlled by the illuminati.

2. The illuminati have now successfully completed their agendas of totally terrorizing and brainwashing the sheep, celebrated officially with the satanic ritual murder of Terri Schindler, named Schiavo (slave) by the illuminati. Just think about the fact that now the large majority knows that 9/11 was an inside job, and yet about everyone will deny it in public. No wonder: the consequences of total brainwash and total terror include total lack of reaction, even at the sight of the doors of the slaughterhouse.

 9/11 Eyewitnesses in Lower Manhattan - not a problem for the illuminati script

Of course the  9/11 plan had a few "witnesses" being immediately interviewed to let us know they had seen the planes. But what about those watching on TV and above all, the real eyewitnesses, those who saw what they should have not seen?
The same illuminati end times features mentioned above explain also why the eyewitnesses were not a problem in the illuminati script for Lower Manhattan:
- total control of mass media;
- the illuminati knew that the "total terror" (officiallly launched at Waco, Texas, 1992) and "total brainwash" agendas were already advanced enough.

Eyewitnesses: the answer to the THREE questions that mattered was yes

The hoaxers knew the script would work, since there were no doubts about the answer to the three most important questions.
1. The key question: would it be possible to completely censor the few eyewitnesses (testimonies and their films, photos) that understood there were no planes? These people are:
a) WTC survivors including firemen (most of them died) that saw the scene close to the "impact" and saw no debris of the planes.
b) People on the ground that hear no noise or had their eyes and cameras focused at the point of the second "impact".
BTW, check out what happened to the VIDEO of one of these eyewitnesses, who had the camera zoomed at the area where the explosion simulating the second crash took place... (link deleted)

2. Would it be possible to completely censor those who witnessed the unprecedented demolition of both WTC towers or taped it on video?
3. Finally the question that matters about the thousands of people that would refer to the only detail that could immediately expose the core cover-up, i.e. who heard the explosion of the two mini-Hydrogen bombs just BEFORE the  two WTC towers came down.
It was impossible to completely censor such testimonies as the events took place. The question is: would it be possible to make sure they would never be heard again?
BTW, here is a VIDEO with a collection of such statements from 9/11, short after the bombs were detonated.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B-uOFXsfskM (update: Perps forced YouTube to remove this video)
Answer to all three questions is obviously yes, since the illuminati totally control mass media.
BTW, the question about  those who got the classic demolition of WTC 7 on video is a non-question, since the goal of that part of the script was to terrorize the eyewitnesses, by letting them know that it was an inside job.

TV Witnesses: the answer to the question that mattered was yes

Would it be possible for the TV audience to trust what the images the media was going to produce for them as "live news"? Answer is obviously yes, since the illuminati had previously tested to what utter limits the masses could be fooled "live", and to what length these kind of hoaxes can be covered-up afterwards.
As far as the duration, the ultimate example is the moon landing hoax. But it was staged only a few times. As far as the frequency, the ultimate example is state lottery drawings, broadcasted on TV weekly at prime time and yet the jackpot "winner" is always the same.  Because despite being able to watch the trick, blind people will not be able to see it.
BTW, check when was it exposed the first time.

Even better than in the cases of the moon landing hoax or the state lottery drawings, in this case the illuminati could play the extra "thousands of eyewitnesses" card. So the illuminati had absolutely nothing to fear from the TV witnesses. Later, as the truth would be spoken, the illuminati knew the reaction would be:
- "This didn't just happen on CNN! Umm..it happened in the middle of a large population center in broad daylight."
- "If you're going to tell me that every single eyewitness who saw the planes hit is "in on it", then don't bother"
The core lie transforms the eyewitnesses from an obstacle into one of the keys for the deception.

Forums: May 2006

---

9/11 - WTC - Witness gets close-up of bombs detonating on video, contacts government/media. How prisonplanet.tv (CIA) was used to finish the story, 5 years later

prisonplanet.tv (CIA) tells us fate of witnesses who got close-up of bombs detonating on video
The story of this video - http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-542183109714508590 (update: Perps forced Google to remove this video)
- a witness gets a close-up of the moment of the bombs exploding.
- the witness contacts the government/media.

Five years later, one of the members of the web of disinformation set up by the CIA, prisonplanet.tv, releases the final part of the footage, beginning immediately after the bombs were detonated.

This time only the audio was dubbed, to:
- sell the core lie, i.e. that airliners were used;
- plant the usual web of disinformation tracks - "a military plane", etc.

Note: in this video, only the first thirty seconds after the text introduction are relevant, to check what is explained above.

I don't need to explain why adding planes to this particular video, like the government did with the rest of the videos used to prove that planes were used, was out of question, right?

Forums Sept 2006 - glp -- gim archive